MBA565 Final Project: Comprehensive Market Intelligence & Consumer Insights
Model Performance: R² = 0.50 (explains 50% of variance in ratings)
Key Finding: Brand has significantly more impact on ratings than price or discount percentage. Premium brands command higher ratings regardless of pricing strategies.
| Brand | Impact Coefficient | Average Rating | Market Position |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.558 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Premium Leader |
|
G
Google
|
0.529 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Premium |
|
R
realme
|
0.515 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Budget |
|
P
POCO
|
0.506 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Budget |
|
V
Vivo
|
0.492 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Mid-tier |
|
iQ
IQOO
|
0.474 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Mid-tier |
|
|
0.316 | ⭐⭐⭐ | Mid-premium |
Model Performance: R² = 0.6742 (67.42% variance explained)
Key Insight: Storage is the strongest determinant of smartphone price, while memory and camera features show inconsistent impact.
Correlation: 0.46 (moderate positive)
Higher-priced phones generally receive higher ratings, but the relationship is not strongly linear. Brand reputation and features play larger roles than price alone.
1. Market Segmentation: Three distinct segments (Premium, Mid-tier, Budget) with clear differentiation in pricing and features.
2. Brand Equity: Brand has the highest impact on consumer ratings, surpassing price and discount considerations.
3. Storage Premium: Consumers willing to pay significant premiums for increased storage (1TB commands ₹158K+ premium).
4. Discount Effectiveness: Strategic discounting improves both ratings and perception consistency.
5. Youth Market: Generation Y & Z view smartphones as status symbols, prioritizing brand over price.